2
0
mirror of https://github.com/mozilla/cipherscan.git synced 2024-12-25 20:23:41 +01:00

updated README with analysis info

This commit is contained in:
Julien Vehent 2014-10-09 10:03:19 -04:00
parent 5665951b09
commit a722ad177d

View File

@ -218,6 +218,46 @@ $ /cipherscan -j -starttls xmpp jabber.ccc.de:5222
}
```
Analyzing configurations
------------------------
The motivation behind cipherscan is to help admins configure good TLS on their
endpoints. To help this further, the script `analyze.py` compares the results of
a cipherscan with the TLS guidelines from https://wiki.mozilla.org/Security/Server_Side_TLS
and output a level and recommendations.
```bash
$ ./analyze.py -t jve.linuxwall.info
jve.linuxwall.info:443 has intermediate tls
Failed to pass old level. The following items are failing:
* consider enabling SSLv3
* add cipher DES-CBC3-SHA
* use a certificate with sha1WithRSAEncryption signature
* consider enabling OCSP Stapling
Failed to pass intermediate level. The following items are failing:
* consider enabling OCSP Stapling
Failed to pass modern level. The following items are failing:
* remove cipher AES128-GCM-SHA256
* remove cipher AES256-GCM-SHA384
* remove cipher AES128-SHA256
* remove cipher AES128-SHA
* remove cipher AES256-SHA256
* remove cipher AES256-SHA
* disable TLSv1
* consider enabling OCSP Stapling
```
In the output above, `analyze.py` indicates that the target `jve.linuxwall.info`
matches the intermediate configuration level. If the administrator of this site
wants to reach the modern level, the items that failed under the modern tests
should be corrected.
`analyze.py` does not make any assumption on what a good level should be. Sites
operators should now what level they want to match against, based on the
compatibility level they want to support. Again, refer to
https://wiki.mozilla.org/Security/Server_Side_TLS for more information.
Contributors
------------